Specify Books Concering The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)
| Original Title: | The Open Society and Its Enemies: 2. Hegel and Marx |
| ISBN: | 0415278422 (ISBN13: 9780415278423) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Series: | The Open Society and its Enemies #2 |
Karl Popper
Paperback | Pages: 470 pages Rating: 4.02 | 1975 Users | 72 Reviews
Representaion In Pursuance Of Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)
Written in political exile in New Zealand during the World War II and first published in two volumes in 1945, Karl Poppers The Open Society and its Enemies was hailed by Bertrand Russell as a vigorous and profound defence of democracy. Its now legendary attack on the philosophies of Plato, Hegel and Marx prophesied the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe and exposed the fatal flaws of socially engineered political systems.
Particularize Out Of Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)
| Title | : | The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2) |
| Author | : | Karl Popper |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 470 pages |
| Published | : | July 11th 2003 by Routledge (first published 1945) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Politics. Nonfiction. History |
Rating Out Of Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)
Ratings: 4.02 From 1975 Users | 72 ReviewsAssessment Out Of Books The Open Society and Its Enemies - Volume Two: Hegel and Marx (The Open Society and its Enemies #2)
If readers would also read this, in advance or after reading Popper, they would ultimately conclude that this critique is a hatchet job:[Walter Kaufmann, Beacon Press, Boston 1959, page 88-119, Chapter 7: The Hegel Myth and Its Method]http://www.marxists.org/reference/sub...Popper completely misunderstands Hegel, and if you want a serious criticism of Marx, you should look to Leszek Kołakowski - a far better and more reasonable criticism of the communist logic.From Plato to Hegel, the philosopher king is the summit of socialism everywhere, a system in which the "good" thinker knows what is best for all individuals. Karl Popper prefers the free society and counts neo-Platonism among his enemies. Having been raised in an authoritarian Communist culture in Austria, Popper rejected "historicism" in ascertaining that the growth of human knowledge is a causal factor in the evolution of human history, and since "no society can predict, scientifically, its
Brilliant, overall. A great exegesis on both Marx and historicist philosophy. A bit uncharitable to Hegel (though not without reason) and somewhat off-base in the criticism of the sociology of knowledge (philosophers and sociologists of knowledge continue in many ways to talk past each other regarding whether epistemology is a somewhat a priori, criterion-oriented discipline or a socially constructed phenomenon. Having a background in both views, I would suggest that both have merit in their own
don't agree with the angry man at all, but a good read.
I thought that this book was great (both Volume 1 and 2, although people more frequently refer to Volume 2, likely since it discusses Marxism which seems to be more near and dear to people's hearts). Popper wrote The Open Society during World War II when he thought that Europe might soon be under a totalitarian regime.
very plausibly skips over 25 centuries to tie marxism directly into plato.
Well, that was a let down. The cranks on Hegel are worth the while, as is the question of the use of history in the last chapter, but everything else...meh. Popper's thoughts on Marx are like a new invention that protects you against spears: not particularly important anymore, because I can't recall the last time I met a legitimate Marxist. Communists, sure, but out and out Marxists? A thing of the past. Ironically, Popper spends a great deal of time justifying what I see to be the largest
0 Comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.