Specify Appertaining To Books Critique of Pure Reason
| Title | : | Critique of Pure Reason |
| Author | : | Immanuel Kant |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 796 pages |
| Published | : | February 28th 1999 by Cambridge University Press (first published 1781) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Nonfiction. Classics. European Literature. German Literature |
Immanuel Kant
Paperback | Pages: 796 pages Rating: 3.94 | 26662 Users | 590 Reviews
Description Supposing Books Critique of Pure Reason
'The purpose of this critique of pure speculative reason consists in the attempt to change the old procedure of metaphysics and to bring about a complete revolution' Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1781) is the central text of modern philosophy. It presents a profound and challenging investigation into the nature of human reason, its knowledge and its illusions. Reason, Kant argues, is the seat of certain concepts that precede experience and make it possible, but we are not therefore entitled to draw conclusions about the natural world from these concepts. The Critique brings together the two opposing schools of philosophy: rationalism, which grounds all our knowledge in reason, and empiricism, which traces all our knowledge to experience. Kant's transcendental idealism indicates a third way that goes far beyond these alternatives.
Point Books As Critique of Pure Reason
| Original Title: | Kritik der reinen Vernunft |
| ISBN: | 0521657296 (ISBN13: 9780521657297) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Rating Appertaining To Books Critique of Pure Reason
Ratings: 3.94 From 26662 Users | 590 ReviewsJudgment Appertaining To Books Critique of Pure Reason
I am not going to attempt to provide a run down of this book, since at over 700 pages of dense and meticulous argumentation, I would not be able to do it justice. However, I will touch on some of what I consider the most important points raised.The book is incredibly dense, but very well written on the whole. Kant is rigorous in both how he structures chapters to lead onto one another nicely and his argumentation itself. Slow and careful reading is required to get the most out of this, as Kantit only gets better the more you read it
Kants Critique of Pure Reason marks what is more or less a beginning of philosophy. It is no longer possible to go back behind his Copernican revolution, as if one could do philosophy without taking into account the subject or consciousness. This turn toward subjectivity is only tightened with the Wittgensteinian and Heideggarian turns toward language. Both naive empiricism (Hume, Locke, etc) and strict rationalism (Leibniz, Wolff, etc) are thoroughly overcome, synthesized if you will. Of course
Great review Roy Lotz! Just wondering-whats your opinion on Fichte ?
My advice for anyone beginning the K.d.r.V. is to maintain your independence of judgment. Don't get buried in the terminology, the secondary literature or your own obsessions or reasons for approaching the book. Try to think through what Kant is saying and bring before your mind all of the possibilities for what he could mean, then eliminate them one by one, until you have arrived at your reading of the Kritik. I would encourage doing Leibniz and the Pre-Critical writings first, otherwise you
I'm trying to decide whether or not I get it.Sometimes I think I have just understood a passage of Kant only to discover that I have actually just been having my own thoughts pertaining to something or other in the content of the passage, and this is sometimes rewarding, but it is nevertheless not exactly what I intended to accomplish.Say Kant is writing about perception or being, and say I misunderstand Kant-- what exactly happens when I misunderstand Kant, and by misunderstanding him,
0 Comments:
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.